<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Glaring omissions: Our critics weigh in on the Sight &#038; Sound Top 50	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://criticspeak.com/glaring-omissions-our-critics-weigh-in-on-the-sight-sound-top-50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://criticspeak.com/glaring-omissions-our-critics-weigh-in-on-the-sight-sound-top-50/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=glaring-omissions-our-critics-weigh-in-on-the-sight-sound-top-50</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews &#38; Film Criticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 21:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul C.		</title>
		<link>https://criticspeak.com/glaring-omissions-our-critics-weigh-in-on-the-sight-sound-top-50/#comment-2125</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.criticspeak.com/?p=3647#comment-2125</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Glaring omissions? How about anything by Luis Bunuel?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glaring omissions? How about anything by Luis Bunuel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: criticspeak.com @ 2026-04-04 10:04:59 by W3 Total Cache
-->